Talk:Eyring equation

Untitled

Could somebody please correct the equations with the double daggers in front of the symbols (G, H and S) the way it is supposed to be, if desired the standard state symbol may remain omitted although especially for H and S it would be more appropriate to depict it. See http://goldbook.iupac.org/E02142.html for an explanation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.125.25.72 (talk) 14:05, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Standard State Term Missing

The version here is missing the standard state term. Compare to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reaction_rate_constant — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ashi Starshade (talk • contribs) 15:08, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

German version

Excuse me, the German version doesn't link back to this site but to "Transition State" instead, can anybody please correct this? (because I don't know how...)xy (talk) 19:40, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Use of both Boltzmann's constant k_B and the gas constant R

These two constants differ only by whether one is talking molecules or moles of molecules; i.e., they are realated by a factor Avagrado's number. Shouldn't this article choose one setting or another (i.e. molecules or moles) and stick with it? — $Q$ uantling (talk | contribs) 13:16, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Remarks about Arrhenius equation

While the page on Arrhenius equation states that it is an empirically derived relation that works remarkably well, this page states that the Arrhenius equation is trivially equivalent to the Eyring equation and that both can be derived from statistical mechanics. There has been some discussion on this matter on the talk page for the Arrhenius equation. I think that the remarks about the Arrhenius equation on this page need to reflect that discussion as well. Otherwise the page on the Arrhenius equation needs to be corrected. Unfortunately I can not confidently say which is correct, myself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.202.137.44 (talk) 21:20, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The transmission constant κ

I don't think κ should be left out or set to 1 in this article, because in the much longer article on transition state theory, the Eyring equation is derived with κ intact and even explained a bit. There is no reason to have only an abbreviated version of the Eyring equation in the "front page" for the Eyring equation, even if it is, as may be, the most common variant.

178.38.90.162 (talk) 15:22, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

First link to Regensburg cite redirects to something

Hey never posted before. But when I clicked the link some weird redirection server sent me to some tile store. Probably should be deleted so it doesn't send people to bad sites. Didn't want to delete it myself since someone might want to update it / I don't know what I'm doing.

~Sam — Preceding unsigned comment added by Salotz (talk • contribs) 03:38, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed it using the wayback machine. Qsq (talk) 05:02, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]